"Art, like morality, consists of drawing the line somewhere."
- G. K. Chesterton
It was a very timely discussion, even if I do say so myself. (It was my birthday, and it’s on days like those that I can’t help but think about where my life is going, where it is, and what in the world happened to make it that way.) In our legal ethics class I was asked, “Would you defend a drug lord, if he paid you two million pesos to represent him?”
I said no. How could I, when he caused so much harm to society? After the horror stories my family and friends have told me, about what those they loved and cared for had gone through because of drugs, how it ruined their lives and made everyone unhappy, how could I defend someone who could have caused all this?
Then again, how could I not? As some people pointed out, everyone has the right to representation. Entitled to it, even. Everyone, in other words, is entitled to the proper administration of justice, to due process – even “drug lords”, who may have caused so much trouble and heartbreak.
May have. Which is why they should have the chance to defend themselves.
How could you defend someone you didn’t believe in, though? Or someone you felt, in your heart of hearts, was guilty? If, for example, you did defend him and he was acquitted, could you live with yourself? Knowing that you helped him walk free, knowing you may have helped someone who was going to hurt more people? Then again, as our professor had said, who are you to decide who’s guilty or not? You’re not the judge. (And really, if you think about it, who is he? He’s human as well, isn't he?)
Something a blockmate of mine (Linus) said calmed me down, though. He said that well, really, there would probably be a lot of lawyers who’d jump at the chance to defend someone for two million. (This is not to put down lawyers in general, but we have to admit, there are those who’d do it for the money. Some would defend him as well, because they firmly believed he was entitled to it, to justice, and I honestly believe they would be great.) He added that, in his opinion, a lawyer was the sum of everything he or she believed in. You had to have your own values, you had to draw a line somewhere. If not, then what kind of lawyer would you be? (I was so grateful to him – plus, it was his birthday that day too. Haha.)
So many questions, and really, so many answers. But which one is the right one? Is there even such a thing? I suppose we’ll have to see. It’s my first year in law school, I’ve got three more to go. Maybe by the time I graduate (Please, please God, let me graduate...) I’ll have my answer.
Or maybe I’ll at least know where to draw the line.